Kuselan Review

The 1st thing that comes to my mind when I write my personal review of this movie is “what the hell was p.vasu thinking?”

I must say I haven’t seen the original version of this movie but am sure that was a zillion times better. The movie has a very neat story with the worst possible screenplay. I have never rated p.vasu highly (except for mannan) and my opinion about him is getting worse.

Everyone who reads this blog should definitely have an idea about the story so I am not going to expand on it. However, below is what I felt was good / bad in the movie:

Good:

• Vadivelu comedy – good in parts – exceptional when he meets rajini for the 1st time.
• Rajini’s speech in the end

Bad:

• Worst ever possible screenplay
• Rajini comes to shoot in pasupathi’s town – the vans has posters of kuselan film unit – scenes are for annamalai part 2 and chandramukhi part 2 – doesn’t make any sense.
• A scene of chandramukhi is taken with rajini’s head being slit when the director (p.vasu – whenever I write his name in this blog I am cursing him) says cut. How on earth when a scene like that can be taken live?
• Vadivelu’s wife introduction was very vulgar
• Nayanthara – only dialogue in the movie is – Good Morning Sir – worst of all she has been generous in her skin show, vulgar dressing, worst ever camera angles, what not?
• Unnecessary characters – santhanam, santhana barathy, prabhu and a million others
• Prabhu – what the hell was he doing in the movie? Is there no other actor who could have played that miniscule role? Trust me the introduction scene of prabhu was one of the most hilarious scenes ever.


I wish I could cut p.vasu’s body parts one by one – from the toe nail to the head and torture him to death. A good movie spoilt to the core – thanks to the director.